Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VPB 2003.1579 Generato dall'IA

International Trademark Opposition Rejected Due to Lack of Grounds

Numero d'incarto VPB 2003.1579
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione (GAAC) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An opposition was filed against the registration of an international trademark application based on an existing Swiss trademark. The court excluded the defendant from the proceedings and rejected the opposition, allowing the international trademark to be registered in Switzerland, as the opposition lacked sufficient grounds to prevent its protection.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 36 al. 2 LMarq, Art. 34 al. 2 LMarq, Art. 31 al. 1 LMarq, Art. 62 al. 1 LMarq, Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; International Trademark Opposition Rejected Due to Lack of Grounds: The court excluded the defendant from the proceedings and rejected the opposition, allowing the international trademark to be registered in Switzerland, as the opposition lacked sufficient grounds to prevent its protection.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
opposizione al marchio opposizione marchio comunitario protezione internazionale procedura civile internazionale marchio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 36 al. 2 LMarq
This provision is cited as the basis for rejecting the opposition.
Art. 34 al. 2 LMarq
This provision is cited as the basis for accepting the trademark for protection in Switzerland.
Art. 31 al. 1 LMarq
This provision is cited for the notification of the decision.
Art. 62 al. 1 LMarq
This provision is cited for the possibility of appealing the decision.
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
This provision is cited for the exclusion of the defendant from the proceedings.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited for the fact that the opposition fee remains acquired by the Institute.
Art. 64 LTF
This provision is cited for the fact that no compensation is awarded to the defendant.
Generato dall'IA
VPB 4828-2003-1563
International Trademark Application Opposition Dismissed
VPB 2001.1399
International Trademark Refused in Switzerland Following Opposition Proceedings
VPB 8246-2006-2684
International Trademark Refused in Switzerland Following Opposition Proceeding
VPB 2000.1245
Opposition to International Trademark Application Sustained Based on Swiss Mark
VPB 2007.426
Confusingly Similar International Trademark Application Refused in Switzerland

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 36 al. 2 LMarq

This provision is cited as the basis for rejecting the opposition.

Art. 34 al. 2 LMarq

This provision is cited as the basis for accepting the trademark for protection in Switzerland.

Art. 31 al. 1 LMarq

This provision is cited for the notification of the decision.

Art. 62 al. 1 LMarq

This provision is cited for the possibility of appealing the decision.

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

This provision is cited for the exclusion of the defendant from the proceedings.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited for the fact that the opposition fee remains acquired by the Institute.

Art. 64 LTF

This provision is cited for the fact that no compensation is awarded to the defendant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition no 5791

Opposant/e easyGroup IP Licensing Limited, The Rotunda, 42–43, Gloucester Crescent, Camden, GB-London NW1 7DL, marque suisse no 489174 easyServices, représentée par Kirker & Cie, Conseils en Marques SA, 122, rue de Genève, Case Postale 153, 1226 Thônex contre Défendeur IKC Zwijndrecht B.V., W. Snelliusweg 94, NL-3331 EZ Zwijnd-recht, marque internationale no 773428 EASYBOX (fig.). Le 21 juillet 2003, l’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a décidé ce qui suit:

1. La défenderesse est exclue de la procédure.

2. L’opposition no 5791/2002 contre la marque internationale no IR-773428 EASYBOX (fig.) est rejetée.

3. La marque internationale no IR-773428 EASYBOX (fig.) sera acceptée à la protection en Suisse après l’entrée en force de la présente décision.

4. La taxe d’opposition de 800 francs reste acquise à l’Institut.

5. Aucun dépens n’est alloué à la défenderesse.

6. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties; par publication dans la Feuille fédérale pour la partie défenderesse.

Voies de droit: La présente décision peut être attaquée par voie de recours dans les 30 jours à dater de sa notification devant la Commission de recours en matière de propriété intellectuelle, Einsteinstrasse 2, 3003 Berne. Les mémoires de recours doivent être présentés en trois exemplaires.

21 juillet 2003 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

2003-1579 4829 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'opposition n° 5791

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2003 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 29 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 29.07.2003 Date Data

Seite 4829-4829 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 127 533

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.