Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ZZ.1995.37 • OG SO ZZ.1995.37 Generato dall'IA

Unexcused Absence from RAV Meetings Grounds for Unemployment Benefit Suspension

Numero d'incarto ZZ.1995.37
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Soletta (CH-SO)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court repeatedly ruled in 1995 that the unexcused failure of an insured person to attend scheduled consultation meetings at the Regional Employment Center (RAV) constitutes a ground for suspending entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits, with appropriate penalty periods ranging from three to twenty-five days, based on the relevant provisions of the Unemployment Insurance Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unexcused Absence from RAV Meetings Grounds for Unemployment Benefit Suspension: The court repeatedly ruled in 1995 that the unexcused failure of an insured person to attend scheduled consultation meetings at the Regional Employment Center (RAV) constitutes a ground for suspending entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits, with appropriate penalty periods ranging from three to twenty-five days, based on the relevant provisions of the Unemployment Insurance Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sospensione delle indennità di disoccupazione disoccupazione diritto alle prestazioni organo dell'assicurazione contro la disoccupazione collocamento di lavoro ferie non retribuite
Generato dall'IA
VSBES.2021.41
Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Missed Consultation and Reporting Violation
VSBES.2016.189
Insured Person v. Unemployment Benefits Administration (Failure to Attend Job Placement Course)
VSBES.2017.262
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Missed Counseling Appointments
VSBES.2024.165
Unemployment Suspension Reduced for Failure to Attend Job Measure

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

SOG 1995 Nr. 37

Art. 17 Abs. 1 und 3, 30 Abs. 1 lit. d AVIG *- Unentschuldigtes Versäumnis eines Beratungsgesprächs beim Regionalen Arbeitsvermittlungszentrum (RAV) führt zur Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung.*

Das Versicherungsgericht hat im Jahre 1995 mehrfach erkannt, dass das unentschuldigte Versäumnis von Beratungsgesprächen bei den Regionalen Arbeitsvermittlungszentren (RAV) einen Grund zur Einstellung des Versicherten in der Anspruchsberechtigung auf Arbeitslosenentschädigung bildet. Dabei wurden

3 bis 25 Sperrtage als angemessen betrachtet.

*Versicherungsgericht, diverse Urteile aus dem Jahre 1995*