Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
3B 11 59 • KG LU 3B 11 59 Generato dall'IA

Superprovisional Measure in Matrimonial Protection Not Appealable

Numero d'incarto 3B 11 59
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court ruled that a superprovisional measure issued in a first-instance matrimonial protection proceeding must be materially qualified as such under the relevant statute, meaning it is not subject to appeal; consequently, an appeal filed against such a measure cannot be entertained because superprovisional orders issued within matrimonial protection proceedings, which are equated to precautionary measures under the relevant federal provisions, are explicitly not subject to cantonal remedies, reflecting the summary nature of the decision and the immediate procedural step for the opposing party to seek reconsideration by the issuing court.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 271 lit. a ZPO i.V.m. Art. 265 ZPO und Art. 308 ff. ZPO. Eine im erstinstanzlichen Eheschutzverfahren erlassene superprovisorische Massnahme ist materiell als solche im Sinne von Art. 265 ZPO zu qualifizieren. Somit ist sie nicht mit einem Rechtsmittel anfechtbar, weshalb auf eine gegen sie eingereichte Berufung nicht eingetreten werden kann. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
misure superprovvisionali regime dei beni fra i coniugi decisioni incidentali misure cautelari nel divorzio misure cautelari procedura preparatoria del matrimonio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 271 lit. a ZPO
This article was cited in connection with the characterization of the decision as falling under the summary procedure applicable to matrimonial protection measures.
Art. 265 ZPO
The appeal was dismissed because the contested order was qualified as a superprovisional measure under this article, against which no appeal is available.
Art. 276 ZPO
Art. 98 BGG
Art. 179 Abs. 2 ZGB
Art. 179 Abs. 1 ZGB
Art. 315 Abs. 4 lit. b ZPO
Art. 276 Abs. 1 ZPO

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 133 III 393
Maintenance Payments and Property Separation in Marital Protection Case
BGE 137 III 475
Father v. Mother (Custody Suspension)
BGE 137 III 417
Superprovisional Measures Not Appealable to Federal Supreme Court Without Exhausting Cantonal Instances
Generato dall'IA
3C 19 4
Superprovisional Measures in Marital Protection Proceedings: Appealability and Requirement for Immediate Subsequent Ruling
3B 21 7
Custody Appeal Jurisdiction Over Superprovisional Measure
3B 14 60
Appealability of Order Granting Regular Provisional Measures Following Ex Parte Hearing
3B 25 9
Appeal Period for Provisional Spousal Protection Measures

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 265 ZPO

The appeal was dismissed because the contested order was qualified as a superprovisional measure under this article, against which no appeal is available.

Art. 271 lit. a ZPO

This article was cited in connection with the characterization of the decision as falling under the summary procedure applicable to matrimonial protection measures.

Art. 308 ff. ZPO

The appeal was declared inadmissible, which implies that the provisions governing the appeal procedure were not applicable due to the nature of the order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 3. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 05.11.2011

Fallnummer: · 3B 11 59

LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 35

Leitsatz: · Art. 271 lit. a ZPO i.V.m. Art. 265 ZPO und Art. 308 ff. ZPO. Eine im erstinstanzlichen Eheschutzverfahren erlassene superprovisorische Massnahme ist materiell als solche im Sinne von Art. 265 ZPO zu qualifizieren. Somit ist sie nicht mit einem Rechtsmittel anfechtbar, weshalb auf eine gegen sie eingereichte Berufung nicht eingetreten werden kann.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.