Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/727/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/727/2014 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Rejection Based on Untimely Procedural Submissions

Numero d'incarto ATAS/727/2014
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a decision concerning the rejection of a claim, where the core issue involved the proper application of procedural rules regarding the submission of evidence and argumentation. The court upheld the lower tribunal's decision, reasoning that the appellant failed to adhere to the mandatory deadlines and formats stipulated for presenting new facts and legal arguments during the appeal process, thus justifying the lower court's refusal to consider the untimely submissions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 93 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Rejection Based on Untimely Procedural Submissions: The court upheld the lower tribunal's decision, reasoning that the appellant failed to adhere to the mandatory deadlines and formats stipulated for presenting new facts and legal arguments during the appeal process, thus justifying the lower court's refusal to consider the untimely submissions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
controllo della procedura nuove allegazioni di diritto disposizioni imperative e legge del contratto preclusione per tardività impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 LTF
The appeal was rejected because it did not meet the requirements for admissibility concerning an appeal against a non-final decision.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
P/9797/2023
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Written Submission
AC/477/2015
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
PM/1122/2016
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Filing and Lack of Good Faith
P/9454/2023
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing
A/3140/2013
Untimely Appeal Due to Late Filing and Procedural Deficiencies

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 LTF

The appeal was rejected because it did not meet the requirements for admissibility concerning an appeal against a non-final decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/891/2014

### [ATAS/727/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1969961) du 17.06.2014 ( CHOMAG ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0007/ATAS_000727_2014_A_891_2014.pdf)

* /