Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/686/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/686/2007 Generato dall'IA

Law of the Case Doctrine and Interlocutory Modification of Judgment

Numero d'incarto ATAS/686/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court considered whether a ruling regarding an earlier set of findings and conclusions, which modified a judgment in part, precluded the party from raising certain issues regarding the original judgment in a subsequent appeal, particularly concerning the application of a specific legal standard to the admitted facts. The court reasoned that because the earlier ruling was an interlocutory modification that did not address all the issues currently being appealed, and the issues raised in the current appeal were not fully decided or waived in the prior proceedings, the party was not barred by the law of the case doctrine from challenging the specific aspects of the original judgment related to the legal standard applied to the established factual record.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Law of the Case Doctrine and Interlocutory Modification of Judgment: The court reasoned that because the earlier ruling was an interlocutory modification that did not address all the issues currently being appealed, and the issues raised in the current appeal were not fully decided or waived in the prior proceedings, the party was not barred by the law of the case doctrine from challenging the specific aspects of the original judgment related to the legal standard applied to the established factual record.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
dottrina giuridica impugnabilità di decisioni incidentali aspetti giuridici revisione di una decisione effetti delle pronunce pregiudiziali obbligo di porre delle domande

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
C/2082/2021
Appealability of Interlocutory Evidentiary Rulings
A/2333/2007
Preclusion Doctrines and Prior Judgments
C/20742/2021
Appeal Regarding Interlocutory Evidentiary Rulings Admissibility
A/3146/2006
Statute of Limitations and Law of the Case Doctrine
A/2046/2003
Issue Preclusion in Prior Litigation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

           #$%&#&''( )#$*$#&''(

 )

 )  )+     +  

,  &  -. / &''( 



  !"#$$%&  ' & ( 

(

&&  &    &  &)*!(((+,(+#-. '#/ (!" 011   0 && /    23 4,(+$-#$## #.



                 ! "   

   /$5./  

  "  ( (8" 9 :  ;/,<  (= , 011     0 && /    ;/,<  =  $$ >?$%%3

    $% 8"? $%%3 , @  ( !  @   ( "A!"((@?B8(!(

  ",  0   $. ! $%%3  "(   !! C!,<(!(!,")BD((@0,( (

 0,,       !,( (!" ,    $6 ? $%%7

A,(8,/(, #3?$%%3

(( @0(@( ("(""9?  8( @  ",  "(" !  B""8 0 ( 0? (" (<   ?(," ,((E ?

    B  (  #2 ? $%%3  8A(  " ,  @0((( 03!$%%3

(( @(0,"E  "8A"

0 ?(  (( @    !,(  " (( A,( (( ((@A,(0(,!"  ((( ,( (

0?( 0, (( 4 F"(( ? B>(:







56+%5$%%7  /.5./  

   +) 1  )  )+     +   

#: ((@( ?B>(:

$: 4 F:

.: 8!,( @G,?(8!(,"(H(   "  .% > <  (8( ,<  B 8" " ;&)IJ)8@77%%+  =,? !(<  ( ,B8!"!(A(:6$ 8" " B8" " #3 > $%%- ; 1=K  !"!   (  @   !(8 ( !4 ,?(,(E( ( ! (K ( H(  "  B 8" " , ? ,(  , ? "(@ A  ( 0(:+$ 1:,"(H((,<, ( ?@"!!!4 ,? ?(H(>(90?:



 E88  " (L             & B& 





,8! ,"(H(((8"A,(,E88



56+%5$%%7