Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/617/2022 • CJ GE ATAS/617/2022 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Concerning Erroneous Supplemental Benefit Repayment and Remission Request

Numero d'incarto ATAS/617/2022
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed an appeal concerning a claim by the supplemental benefits service for the repayment of CHF 7,646, later reduced to CHF 3,322, which had been erroneously paid to the beneficiary between November 2020 and February 2021, a fact the appellant did not dispute during the personal hearing. Following the hearing, where the appellant withdrew the appeal while reiterating a request for remission of the repayment obligation due to financial hardship, the court took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the roll, and formally invited the service to rule on the beneficiary's existing request for remission of the debt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Concerning Erroneous Supplemental Benefit Repayment and Remission Request: Following the hearing, where the appellant withdrew the appeal while reiterating a request for remission of the repayment obligation due to financial hardship, the court took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the roll, and formally invited the service to rule on the beneficiary's existing request for remission of the debt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rimborso del debito caso di rigore restituzione di prestazioni complementari audizione personale procedura di assicurazioni sociali servizio finanziario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is implicitly referenced as the basis for not explicitly mentioning costs, as the decision is a procedural outcome (taking note of withdrawal and striking the case) resulting from the appeal process governed by the LTF.
Generato dall'IA
A/752/2018
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Erroneous Benefit Payments
A/118/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Repayment of Supplementary Benefits
A/985/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Repayment of Benefits
A/3691/2018
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Repayment
A/179/2010
Appeal Regarding Repayment Order for Wrongly Paid Supplementary Benefits

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is implicitly referenced as the basis for not explicitly mentioning costs, as the decision is a procedural outcome (taking note of withdrawal and striking the case) resulting from the appeal process governed by the LTF.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/809/2022 ATAS/617/2022

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 30 juin 2022 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à GENÈVE recourante

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLÉMENTAIRES, DCS - SPC, sis route de Chêne 54, GENÈVE intimé

Siégeant : Karine STECK, Présidente ; Philippe LE GRAND ROY et Christine LUZZATTO, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision du 16 février 2021 du service des prestations complémentaires (ci-après : SPC), constatant qu'un montant de CHF 7'646.- avait été versé à tort à Madame A______ (ci-après : la bénéficiaire) entre le 1er novembre 2020 et le 28 février 2021 et lui en réclamant la restitution; Vu l'opposition de la bénéficiaire du 25 février 2021; Vu la décision du SPC du 25 février 2022, admettant partiellement l'opposition et réduisant le montant réclamé de CHF 7’646.- à CHF 3'322.-; Vu le recours interjeté par la bénéficiaire en date du 11 mars 2022, invoquant une situation financière difficile ne permettant pas de rembourser le montant réclamé; Vu la réponse de l'intimé du 7 avril 2022; Vu l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 30 juin 2022, dont il est ressorti qu'il n'était pas contesté que le montant réclamé avait été versé à tort; Qu'à l'issue de l'audience, la bénéficiaire a retiré son recours en continuant à demander la remise de l'obligation de restituer la somme réclamée; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte, de rayer la cause du rôle et d'inviter l'intimé à statuer sur la demande de remise;

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA PRESIDENTE DE LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

3. Invite l'intimé à statuer sur la demande de remise d'ores et déjà formulée par la bénéficiaire.

La greffière La présidente

Marie-Catherine SECHAUD Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/809/2022