Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/524/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/524/2004 Generato dall'IA

Assignment of Future Earnings Validity Dispute

Numero d'incarto ATAS/524/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The situation involved a dispute over whether certain rights had been validly transferred, specifically concerning the right to future earnings related to an existing agreement. The court reasoned that the transfer in question was an attempted assignment of future earnings that were not yet fixed or ascertainable, and therefore failed under the relevant legal principles governing such assignments. The court concluded that because the purported transfer was of something that did not yet exist as a definable right, it could not operate as a valid present assignment, leading to the determination that the claimed rights had not been effectively transferred.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Assignment of Future Earnings Validity Dispute: The court reasoned that the transfer in question was an attempted assignment of future earnings that were not yet fixed or ascertainable, and therefore failed under the relevant legal principles governing such assignments. The court concluded that because the purported transfer was of something that did not yet exist as a definable right, it could not operate as a valid present assignment, leading to the determination that the claimed rights had not been effectively transferred.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità della cessione del credito credito futuro cessione di salario trasferimento di patrimonio diritti e obblighi precontrattuali calcolo del reddito da valido

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

               #$$%#&''( #)&(#&''(

!!

* !+* ,  *! ,+

 - " &''( ./  01 2 



   3333333333 



 

4,+,  !5,6 * !+ , !+ )*  4! 789  !"#$#%##&'(



                ! "

   0%+(0  

  *1  2 ! 1  %- '1 %../$ 3 4444444444  11  15  6   1!   15 1211 '1  ) ) ) !  1  !1$  7 1  !)'8  )1  179 :

!1#/1%../$ 1&11 )! )1)! (.;1%../:

!1#/;1%../$1*) 15)26 '1 ) )')* 261 &< !! !)=:

61'1 &!  1  8>:



  +,,-+%../  0(+(0  

!  ,+4  !+* ,  *! ,+



70:   ;  <   => -%& ,9

#?   1 :

%? 8>?         "1&@  )1 @   177 A19 A       



!1*!) B   1*1)C! 11126D61*)) 1!"

  +,,-+%../