Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/416/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/416/2016 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Following Amicable Settlement

Numero d'incarto ATAS/416/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant appealed a decision by the cantonal disability insurance office that denied him an allowance for an infirm person; however, after the appeal was filed and the opposing party responded, the claimant's counsel informed the court that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, leading the court to formally acknowledge the withdrawal of the appeal and strike the case from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Following Amicable Settlement: The claimant appealed a decision by the cantonal disability insurance office that denied him an allowance for an infirm person; however, after the appeal was filed and the opposing party responded, the claimant's counsel informed the court that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, leading the court to formally acknowledge the withdrawal of the appeal and strike the case from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
composizione amichevole ritiro delle conclusioni civili assicurazione per invalidità soddisfacimento del credito revoca dell'opposizione soppressione delle prestazioni assicurative

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is typically used in the context of costs, but since the dispositive only orders to take note of the withdrawal and strike the case from the roll, and no specific cost order is explicitly mentioned or applied in the numbered points 1 and 2, this might not strictly apply based on the strict rule (only include if cited in the dispositive). However, in the absence of explicit costs in the dispositive, and given the context of case closure, if costs were mentioned, they would be cited here. Since the dispositive contains only procedural actions (1 and 2) and no explicit cost ruling, only the procedural articles are extracted.
Generato dall'IA
A/3480/2012
Appeal Withdrawn Due to Settlement in Disability Insurance Dispute
A/852/2022
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Amicable Settlement
A/1765/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal After Settlement Offer
A/1274/2005
Withdrawal of Appeal Following Compensation Settlement
A/2241/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal Following Settlement in Invalidity Insurance Case

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is typically used in the context of costs, but since the dispositive only orders to take note of the withdrawal and strike the case from the roll, and no specific cost order is explicitly mentioned or applied in the numbered points 1 and 2, this might not strictly apply based on the strict rule (only include if cited in the dispositive). However, in the absence of explicit costs in the dispositive, and given the context of case closure, if costs were mentioned, they would be cited here. Since the dispositive contains only procedural actions (1 and 2) and no explicit cost ruling, only the procedural articles are extracted.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/737/2016

### [ATAS/416/2016](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1972011) du 23.05.2016 ( AI ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2016/0004/ATAS_000416_2016_A_737_2016.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/737/2016 ATAS/416/2016 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 23 mai 2016 10ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié à ONEX, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître MEMBREZ François · recourant

contre

OFFICE DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE DU CANTON DE GENEVE, Service juridique, sis rue des Gares 12, GENÈVE · intimé

Vu la décision de l'Office cantonal de l'assurance-invalidité (ci-après: OAI) du 1er février 2016 refusant une allocation pour impotent à Monsieur A______ (ci-après: le recourant) ;

Vu le recours du 4 mars 2016 ;

Vu la réponse de l'intimé du 29 mars 2016 ;

Vu le courrier du conseil du recourant du 11 mai 2016, indiquant à la chambre de céans qu'un accord amiable ayant été trouvé entre les parties, le recourant retirait son recours ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Florence SCHMUTZ · Le président Mario-Dominique TORELLO

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le