Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/409/2012 • CJ GE ATAS/409/2012 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Payment Request with Imposed Split Fee

Numero d'incarto ATAS/409/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali ripartite
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant filed a payment request against a defendant, but subsequently, the claimant formally withdrew the request on a specified date, stating the withdrawal was by mutual agreement with the defendant, with each party bearing their own costs. The Arbitral Tribunal for Insurance accepted the withdrawal, noting that the arbitral proceedings were not free, and therefore imposed a fee of 50 francs, to be split equally between both parties, before striking the case from the record.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Payment Request with Imposed Split Fee: The Arbitral Tribunal for Insurance accepted the withdrawal, noting that the arbitral proceedings were not free, and therefore imposed a fee of 50 francs, to be split equally between both parties, before striking the case from the record.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pagamento dell'emolumento procedura arbitrale ritiro delle conclusioni civili partecipazione alle spese dell'assicurato ripetibili deduzione degli oneri permanenti
Generato dall'IA
A/266/2012
Claim Withdrawal and Fee Imposition
A/3739/2011
Claim Withdrawal and Fee Allocation
A/259/2012
Claimant Withdrawal and Cost Allocation in Payment Dispute
A/272/2012
Withdrawal of Payment Claim and Allocation of Arbitral Fees
A/3598/2011
Claimant's Withdrawal of Payment Claim and Allocation of Costs

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 46 de la loi cantonal d'application de LAMal du 29 mai 1997- LaLAMal

Cited in the dispositive to justify the imposition of court fees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/78/2012

### [ATAS/409/2012](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1967185) du 27.03.2012 ( ARBIT ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2012/0004/ATAS_000409_2012_A_78_2012.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/78/2012 ATAS/409/2012 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES

du 27 mars 2012

En la cause

X__________ à Chêne-Bourg, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître MAISSEN Dominique · demandeurs

contre

Y__________ à Martigny · défenderesse

Vu la demande en paiement de X_________ datée du 8 novembre 2011, déposée en date du 13 janvier 2012 ;

Attendu que par courrier daté du 29 février 2012, reçu le 16 mars 2012, X_________ a déclaré retirer sa demande, d’un commun accord avec la défenderesse, chacune des parties supportant ses frais ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte ;

Que la procédure par-devant le Tribunal arbitral n'étant pas gratuite (cf. art. 46 de la loi cantonal d'application de LAMal du 29 mai 1997- LaLAMal), un émolument de 50 fr., sera mis à la charge des parties à raison de la moitié chacune ;

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES :

Prend acte du retrait de la demande.

Met un émolument de 50 fr. à la charge des parties à raison de la moitié chacune.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Florence SCHMUTZ · La présidente Maya CRAMER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le