175.1 GEMGLCO

CH-VS

Art. 156 Loi sur les communes (LCo) - Protection des collectivités de droit public

Surveillance de l'Etat et protection juridique

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (162 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 156 LCo · Protection des collectivités de droit public

1. Les collectivités de droit public et leurs associations ont qualité pour recourir auprès du Tribunal cantonal lorsqu'elles sont atteintes par une décision et qu'elles possèdent un intérêt digne de protection à ce que cette décision soit annulée ou modifiée.

2. En outre, les dispositions et les décisions des autorités de surveillance, prises en violation de l'autonomie communale, peuvent être déférées au Tribunal cantonal.

← Art. 155 LCo Loi sur les communes (LCo) - Champ d'application Art. 157 LCo →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (6)

A1 25 64 · vs (art. 156 al. 1 LCo)

Municipality Appeal Against Interim Decision Lifting Use Prohibition Inadmissible Due to Lack of Irreparable Harm

This provision regarding the right to appeal was cited in the reasoning examining the standing to appeal (qualité pour recourir).

KGVS A1 20 27 · vs (Art. 156 Abs. 1 des Gemeindegesetzes vom 5. Februar 2004 (GemG))

Municipality's Tourist Tax Levy Annulled Over Unverified Occupancy Rate Basis

Cited in the reasoning concerning the standing of municipalities to appeal.

KGVS A1 20 27 · vs (Art. 156 Abs. 2 GemG)

Municipality's Tourist Tax Levy Annulled Over Unverified Occupancy Rate Basis

Cited in the reasoning regarding the ability to appeal supervisory authority decisions that violate municipal autonomy.

A1 19 103 · vs (Art. 156 Abs. 1 GemG)

Municipality's Appeal Against Refusal of Regulation Approval

Cited as the basis for the municipality's right to challenge the refusal of homologation by filing an appeal concerning the violation of municipal autonomy.

A1 12 114 · vs (art. 156 al. 1 LCo)

Property Owner vs. Municipality: Applicability of Facade Setback Rules to Subsurface Structure

Although mentioned in the reasoning (consid. 1) regarding admissibility, it was not cited in the dispositive orders (1, 2, or 3) and is therefore excluded based on the rules.

RVJ 2013 p 7 12 · vs (Art. 156 al. 1 LCo)

Municipality v. Property Owner: Building Setbacks for Subterranean Structures

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for admitting the administrative appeal of the municipality.