711
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 45 Loi sur l'expropriation
7. Constructions, travaux publics, énergie, transports et communications » 71. Expropriation
Art. 45 Loi sur l'expropriation
1 Si l'existence du droit pour lequel on réclame une indemnité est contestée, la procédure est suspendue et un délai est imparti à l'expropriant pour introduire action auprès du juge ordinaire, sous avis qu'en cas d'inobservation du délai l'existence du droit sera reconnue. A la demande de l'une partie, il peut être procédé à une estimation provisoire.
2 La décision quant à l'existence du droit peut être confiée au juge administratif par une déclaration expresse des parties. Dans ce cas, la décision est aussi susceptible de recours à la Cour administrative.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (19)
A-8067/2015 (Art. 35 Bst. b i.V.m. Art. 45 Abs. 1 EntG)
Electricity Transmission Line Right-of-Way Renewal Expedited
Provides for the transfer of matters to the competent authority if the Federal Administrative Court lacks jurisdiction over certain claims.
A-2563/2012 (Art. 45 al. 3 LEx)
Property Owner's Appeal on Early Possession for Railway Project Rejected, Procedural Error Noted
Cited regarding the consequences of the expropriated party failing to appear at the conciliation hearing.
A-3762/2010 (Art. 45 Abs. 2 EntG)
Federal Energy Office Power Line Upgrade Re-evaluation
The court mentioned the conciliation hearing for expropriation objections.
10.2009.26.1 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 5 Lespr)
Expropriation for Public Parking Upheld Against Developer Objection
This provision is cited in the dispositive structure by mentioning that the determination of compensation will follow in a separate decision, as implied by the rejection of the plan modification request.
09.001 · bl (§ 45 lit. a und b VPO i.V.m. § 96 Abs. 3 EntG)
Property Owner's Road Contribution Assessment Reduced Due to Pre-Existing Access
Defines the limited scope of review for the Enteignungsgericht regarding municipal decisions on contributions.
50.2007.5 · ti (art. 45 Lespr)
Municipality Expropriation Upheld Over Landowner's Access Challenge
Cited in the final decree's preamble as the basis for the decision made by the first instance court whose ruling is being reviewed.
10.2005.9.1 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 5 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Sewage Easement Upheld Despite Owner Opposition
Cited in the dispositive order 6 to indicate that the decision on the indemnity will follow separately once the present judgment is final (implicitly referenced by the structure of order 2).
10.2005.9.1 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 5 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Sewage Easement Upheld Despite Owner Opposition
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the decision on the indemnity will follow separately once the present judgment is final.
10.2005.2.1 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 5 Lespr.)
Public Entity Expropriation for Road Formalization Upheld Despite Landowner Challenge to Public Interest
Cited to state that the judgment on compensation and costs will follow separately once the current decision becomes final.
20.2005.22.1 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 5 Lespr.)
Expropriation Tribunal Upholds Road Widening and Traffic Island Plan Against Property Owner Objections
Cited to justify reserving the examination of compensation amounts for a separate judgment after the present decision becomes final.
20.2004.14.1 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 5 Lespr.)
Property Owner Opposition to Municipality Expropriation for Road Improvement
The article cited regarding the separate ruling on the indemnity is mentioned in the reasoning, but not explicitly in the final orders 1-5.
20.2004.32.1 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 5 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Cantonal Road Widening Upheld Over Property Owner Objection
Cited in the reasoning before the dispositive regarding the separate judgment for the indemnity, but not explicitly in the final orders.
50.1999.6 · ti (Art. 45 Lespr)
Expropriation Confirmed: Public Utility and Proportionality Upheld in Park Land Case
This provision was cited by the lower court (Tribunale di espropriazione) as the basis for its decision, which was then reviewed by the current court in the context of the appeal.
50.1997.36 · ti (Art. 45 Lespr)
Property Owner v. Water Purification Consortium (Early Possession and Route Challenge)
Cited in the final list of applicable articles, concerning the decision of the first instance court.
50.1995.15 · ti (art. 45 Lespr)
Property Owners' Expropriation Appeal Moot Due to Settlement Agreement
Cited in the relevant law section, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.