711
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 27 Loi sur l'expropriation
7. Constructions, travaux publics, énergie, transports et communications » 71. Expropriation
Art. 27 Loi sur l'expropriation
1 La chose expropriée sera restituée dans l'état où elle se trouve lors de la demande de rétrocession.
2 Dans la mesure où le droit à restituer n'en subirait pas un dommage disproportionné, l'expropriant peut enlever les installations qu'il a faites.
3 Le titulaire du droit à rétrocession est tenu de rembourser les autres impenses conférant une plus-value à la chose. L'indemnité à verser est fixée par le juge administratif sous réserve de recours à la Cour administrative.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (10)
VPB 07-1435-6039 (Art. 27 al. 2 LEx)
Aircraft Noise Compensation Streamlining Act
Specifies that information and plans necessary for the public plan deposit procedure, including environmental impact studies, are also required for the expropriation procedure, ensuring explicit inclusion of neighborhood rights to be withdrawn.
A-480/2021 (art. 27 LEx)
Property Co-owners' Compensation for Railway Servitudes and Restrictions
This provision states that the expropriation procedure is conducted in combination with the plan approval procedure.
A-481/2021 (Art. 27 LEx)
Improper Dismissal of Expropriation Claim Due to Procedural Oversight
Cited to explain when expropriation proceedings are conducted in combination with plan approval procedures.
A-483/2021 (art. 27 LEx)
Annulment for Violation of Right to be Heard and Inquisitorial Principle
This article deals with the combination of expropriation procedures with plan approval procedures.
10.2009.13.2 · ti (art. 27 Lespr)
Expropriation Valuation for Road Widening on Parcel 3460
Mentioned in the facts (1.3) but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders; excluded based on rules.
10.2009.15.1 · ti (art. 27 Lespr)
Public Entity Expropriation for Water Pipeline vs. Property Owner Opposition Regarding Route Modification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the notification procedure, but not explicitly in the dispositive.
10.2004.91.1 · ti (art. 27 Lespr.)
Landowner Challenge to Lakeside Property Expropriation Success Due to Procedural Defects
Cited as the basis for the municipality claiming simplification due to prior PR approval, but the simplification was rejected, leading to the annulment based on other defects.
10.2004.91 · ti (Art. 27 no. 4 Vorbemerkungen zu art. 27-44 Lespr.)
Municipality Expropriation Annulled Due to Procedural Defects in Land Seizure
Cited in reasoning regarding the principle of uniformity, but not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive, therefore excluded based on strict rule.
10.2004.91 · ti (art. 27 s Lespr.)
Municipality Expropriation Annulled Due to Procedural Defects in Land Seizure
Implicitly addressed by the finding regarding the violation of the principle of uniformity, which pertains to the scope of the expropriation notice and procedure.
10.2011.4 · ti (art. 27 Lespr)
Municipality Expropriation for Public Parking: Indemnity Calculation Dispute
Cited in the facts section as the basis for the authority to omit public notification, relevant to the procedural context of the expropriation initiated.