455.1
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 22 Ordonnance portant exécution de la législation fédérale sur la protection des animaux
4. Éducation, science, culture, Église » 45. Protection de la nature et du paysage » 455. Protection des animaux
Art. 22 Ordonnance portant exécution de la législation fédérale sur la protection des animaux
Les décisions prises en application de la législation sur la protection des animaux sont susceptibles de recours conformément aux dispositions du Code de procédure administrative.
← Art. 21 Ordonnance portant exécution de la législation fédérale sur la protection des animaux
4. Éducation, science, culture, Église » 45. Protection de la nature et du paysage » 455. Protection des animaux
Art. 23 Ordonnance portant exécution de la législation fédérale sur la protection des animaux →
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (5)
SB150385 · zh (Art. 28 Abs. 1 lit. g TSchG in Verbindung mit Art. 22 Abs. 1 lit. d TSchV)
Hunting Lessee Convicted for Inhumane Dispatch of Injured Fox
This provision is cited in the dispositive order (Order 2) as the basis for acquitting the accused.
A/698/2015 · ge (art. 22 al. 1 let. b OPAn - RS 455.1)
Appellant v. Administration Regarding Medically Unsubstantiated Caudectomy
This provision establishes the prohibition on importing dogs with cropped ears or tails, which is the core issue being judged regarding the legality of keeping the dog in Switzerland.
A/1177/2012 · ge (art. 22 al. 1 let. b OPAn)
Rottweiler Seizure Upheld Due to Prohibited Breed Status and Illegal Importation
This provision prohibits the importation of docked dogs, further justifying the rejection of the appeal.
52.2001.125 · ti (art. 1, art. 2, art. 6, art. 9, art. 22, art. 66 OPAn)
Appeal Regarding Authorization Requirements for Keeping Pheasants and Partridges
These articles of the Cantonal Ordinance on Animal Protection were cited as part of the legal basis for the decision.
SB150385 · zh (Art. 28 Abs. 1 lit. g TSchG in Verbindung mit Art. 22 Abs. 1 lit. d TSchV)
Hunting Leaseholder Convicted for Cruel Killing of Injured Fox
This provision is cited in the dispositive (Order 2) as the basis for acquitting the defendant of the secondary charge (infringement of animal protection law).