101
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 9 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura
1. État, peuple, autorités » 10. Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux
Art. 9 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura
1 Nul ne peut être soustrait à son juge naturel.
2 Toute partie doit être entendue avant qu'il soit statué sur sa cause.
3 Chacun a le droit de consulter le dossier de sa cause, sauf dans les cas prévus par la loi.
4 Les parties dépourvues des ressources nécessaires ont droit à l'assistance judiciaire gratuite selon la loi.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (15)
ADM 2023 54 · ju (art. 9 Cst.)
Municipality Denied Subsidy for Village Water Connection
Cited as the constitutional basis for the principle of good faith.
ADM 2023 48 · ju (art. 9 de la Constitution fédérale (Cst.))
Farmer's Appeal Against Land Sale Dismissed
Cited as the constitutional basis for the principle of good faith, applicable to all state activities.
ADM 2021 81 · ju (Art. 9 Cst)
Father's Appeal on Parental Authority and Child Contact Granted in Part
Cited in the context of the appellant's claim of arbitrary decision-making.
ADM 2021 50 · ju (art. 9 Cst.)
Farmer's illegal apartments must be removed.
Cited as the constitutional basis for the principle of good faith, which protects citizens' legitimate trust in administrative assurances.
CPR 2021 43 · ju (art. 9 Cst)
Remand for New Decision on Probation Extension Due to Procedural Violations
This constitutional provision was invoked to highlight the fundamental right to protection of one's good faith in dealings with the state.
ADM 2020 109 · ju (Art. 9 Cst. féd.)
Taxpayer's Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing
Cited in relation to the principle of good faith and its application in tax matters.
CA 2020 30 · ju (Art. 9 Cst.)
Agricultural Zone Construction Permit Denial for Motorcycle Showcase
This constitutional article is cited as the basis for the principle of good faith, which was discussed in relation to the applicant's reliance on previous administrative assurances.
ADM 2020 15 · ju (art. 9 Cst.)
Property Owner's Appeal Regarding Betterment Contribution Dismissed
This article is cited in relation to the principle of protection against arbitrariness, which requires decisions to be manifestly unsustainable or to gravely disregard a clear legal norm or principle.
CC 2019 31 · ju (art. 9 Cst.)
Child Placement and Welfare in Abusive Family Situation
Cited as a potential violation if the court relies on a non-conclusive expert report, leading to an arbitrary assessment of evidence.
ADM 2018 97 · ju (Art. 9 Cst.)
Public Employee Salary Adjustment Retroactivity Dispute
Invoked by the appellant regarding the prohibition of arbitrariness, but rejected in the reasoning.
ADM 2017 64 · ju (art. 9 Cst.)
Educator's Salary Classification Upheld Despite Equal Treatment Claim
Used to assess claims of arbitrariness.
ADM 2018 109 · ju (art. 9 Cst.)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Tourist Tax Challenge Dismissed
Provision used to assess the appellant's claim of arbitrary application of the law regarding the calculation basis of the tourist tax.
ADM 2018 60 · ju (Art. 5 et 9 Cst.)
Waste Disposal Tax Assessment for Campsite Upheld
Cited as constitutional guarantees for legal certainty, predictability, and protection of good faith, related to the prohibition of retroactivity.
ADM 2016 99 · ju (art. 9 Cst.)
Police Officers' Job Classification Challenge Dismissed
Cited in relation to the prohibition of arbitrariness.
ADM 2013 96 · ju (art. 9 Cst.)
Family Home Building Permit Upheld Despite Density Transfer and Use Objections
Right to be treated by state bodies without arbitrariness and in accordance with good faith.