Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
101 CH-JU

Art. 76 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura

1. État, peuple, autorités » 10. Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (154 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 76 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura

1 Le Parlement décide si les dispositions qu'il adopte ou modifie à la suite d'une initiative conçue en termes généraux figurent dans la Constitution ou dans la loi.

2 Si le Parlement décide de ne pas donner suite à une initiative valable ou n'y satisfait pas dans un délai de deux ans, elle est présentée au vote populaire.

3 Le Parlement peut opposer un contre-projet à toute initiative.

4 Si le peuple accepte une initiative conçue en termes généraux, le Parlement doit y satisfaire dans un délai de deux ans.

5 Si le peuple accepte à la fois l'initiative et le contre-projet, est adopté le projet qui a obtenu le plus grand nombre de voix.

← Art. 75 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura 1. État, peuple, autorités » 10. Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux Art. 77 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (22)

VVGE.2001.02.Nr.29 · ow (Art. 76 Abs. 4 BV)
Municipality Concession for Water Extraction Invalidated by Third-Party Spring Ownership Claim
Referred to in the context of the canton's sovereignty over water bodies, distinct from ownership.
A-4148/2020 (Art. 76 al. 4 Cst.)
Appellant's Water Rights Do Not Include Respondent's Expired Rights
Cited to establish that cantons own water resources but the Confederation has the right to use water for its transport enterprises, requiring payment of a fee and compensation.
7R 20 1 · lu (Art. 76 Abs. 3 BV)
Cantonal Water Protection Ordinance Amendments Upheld Against Competence and Rights Challenges
Federal law on water protection provided the basis for the cantonal measures, which were examined under this provision.
RRB.Nr.2016.001029 · ag (Art. 76 Abs. 3 BV)
Federal Oversight of Water Protection Zones Affirmed
This constitutional provision, stating that the Confederation issues regulations on water protection, is used to establish water protection as a federal task.
B.2015.25 · sg (Art. 76 und 78 BV (SR 101))
Stream Channelization vs. Orchard Use Appeal
Cited in the reasoning as the constitutional basis for the public interests (flood protection and nature conservation) underlying the decision, which was confirmed by the dismissal of the appeal.
B.2015.25 · sg (Art. 76 BV)
Eminent Domain for Flood Protection Versus Orchard Use
Cited as part of the public interests considered in the overall assessment, which supports the final decision to dismiss the appeal.
OGVE.2014.15.29.htm · ow (Art. 76 Abs. 1 BV)
Flood Protection Project Upheld: Site Suitability and Public Interest Considered
Cited to establish flood protection as an important public interest.
B.2012.74 · sg (Art. 76 BV)
Stream Diversion for Flood Control Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge
Cited as reflecting the significant public interest in water hazard defense.
B.2012.74 · sg (Art. 76 BV)
Stream Diversion for Flood Control Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge
The court cited this article as reflecting the significant public interest in water hazard defense, which generally ranks equally with property rights.
B.2012.74 · sg (Art. 76 BV)
Water Construction Project Approval Upheld Against Property Owners' Appeal
Cited as the constitutional basis for the public interest in flood protection, placing it on par with property rights.
VB.2012.00398 · zh (Art. 76 Abs. IV BV)
Jurisdictional Dispute Over Water Fee Reduction for Federally Mandated Power Plant Renovation
This constitutional provision is cited among the legal norms relevant to the case.
VB.2012.00398 · zh (Art. 76 Abs. V BV)
Jurisdictional Dispute Over Water Fee Reduction for Federally Mandated Power Plant Renovation
This constitutional provision is cited among the legal norms relevant to the case.
AC.2008.0130 · vd (Art. 76 Cst.)
Fluvial Correction Project Approval and Land Expropriation Challenge
Cited as the constitutional basis granting the Confederation legislative power over river management.
AC.2008.0130 · vd (Art. 76 al. 1 Cst.)
Fluvial Correction Project Approval and Land Expropriation Challenge
Cited as a constitutional basis for the public interest in protection against the damaging effects of water, supporting the river correction project.
AC.2008.0130 · vd (Art. 76 al. 3 Cst.)
Fluvial Correction Project Approval and Land Expropriation Challenge
Cited as a constitutional basis for the public interest in river revitalization, supporting the necessity of the project.