Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
101 CH-JU

Art. 53 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura

1. État, peuple, autorités » 10. Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (154 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 53 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura

L'Etat encourage l'aide humanitaire et coopère au développement des peuples défavorisés.

← Art. 52 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura 1. État, peuple, autorités » 10. Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux Art. 54 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (5)

VVGE.1966.70.Nr.29 · ow (Art. 53 Abs. 2 BV)
Citizen Graves Ordinance Dispute
The court cited this provision to establish the authority of the municipal council to regulate burial sites, even if private rights existed, and to justify the abolition of citizen graves.
VPB 150000317 (Art. 53 al. 3 Cst.)
Electorate Approval for Canton Changes
Cited as the legal basis for the modification of canton territory requiring approval from the electorate concerned and the cantons.
GE.2009.0076 · vd (Art. 53 al. 2 Cst.)
Right to Self-Determination of Remains vs. Familial Interests in Burial Location
The court cited this article in the reasoning section when discussing the deceased's constitutional right to decent burial, which supported the decision against the appealers.
A/2093/2006 · ge (Art. 53 Cst/GE)
Referendum Challenge on Building Elevation Law: Aggregation of Signatures and Duplicate Verification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the required number of signatures for a referendum, although the main ground for annulment was procedural.
JAAC 53.36 (Art. 53 Abs. 2 BV)
Federal Council Dismisses Appeal on Cemetery Permit Due to Prior Supreme Court Ruling
Cited as the constitutional right to a decent burial, which the appellant argued was threatened, but not applied due to the Federal Court's prior decision and lack of jurisdiction.