101
CH-JU
Art. 36 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura
1. État, peuple, autorités » 10. Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux
Art. 36 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura
L'Etat entretient ou encourage les établissements spécialisés dans lesquels les handicapés reçoivent une formation adaptée à leur état.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (40)
CON 2020 8 · ju (Art. 36 Cst.)
Mandatory Mask Ordinance Upheld
Cited as the legal basis for examining restrictions on fundamental rights.
CON 2020 8 · ju (Art. 36 al. 1 Cst.)
Mandatory Mask Ordinance Upheld
Cited for the requirement of a legal basis for any restriction of a fundamental right.
CON 2020 8 · ju (Art. 36 al. 2 Cst.)
Mandatory Mask Ordinance Upheld
Cited for the requirement that any restriction of a fundamental right must be justified by public interest or protection of others' rights.
CON 2020 8 · ju (Art. 36 al. 3 Cst.)
Mandatory Mask Ordinance Upheld
Cited for the requirement that any restriction of a fundamental right must be proportionate to the intended goal.
CON 2020 8 · ju (Art. 36 al. 4 Cst.)
Mandatory Mask Ordinance Upheld
Cited for the requirement that any restriction of a fundamental right must not violate its essence.
CPR 2023 73 · ju (art. 36 al. 1 Cst.)
Domestic Dispute Defendant's Provisional Detention Upheld Due to Risk of Reoffending
Cited as a legal basis for provisional detention, requiring conformity with personal liberty guarantees.
CPR 2023 73 · ju (art. 36 al. 2 Cst.)
Domestic Dispute Defendant's Provisional Detention Upheld Due to Risk of Reoffending
Cited regarding the principle of proportionality for provisional detention.
CPR 2023 73 · ju (art. 36 al. 3 Cst.)
Domestic Dispute Defendant's Provisional Detention Upheld Due to Risk of Reoffending
Cited regarding the principle of proportionality and the necessity of considering less restrictive measures than detention.
CPR 2023 77 · ju (Art. 36 al. 3 Cst.)
Provisional Detention Upheld for Suspected Drug Trafficker
Cited for the principle of proportionality, requiring consideration of less restrictive measures.
CPR 2023 10 · ju (art. 36 al. 3 Cst.)
Pre-trial Detention Upheld Due to Flight Risk and Recidivism
Cited in relation to the principle of proportionality and the examination of alternative measures to detention.
CPR 2022 116 · ju (art. 36 al. 1 Cst.)
Detention Upheld in Drug Trafficking Case Due to Flight Risk and Ongoing Investigation
Cited as the constitutional basis requiring a legal foundation for deprivation of liberty.
CPR 2022 116 · ju (art. 36 al. 2 Cst.)
Detention Upheld in Drug Trafficking Case Due to Flight Risk and Ongoing Investigation
Cited as the constitutional basis requiring public interest and proportionality for deprivation of liberty.
CPR 2022 116 · ju (art. 36 al. 3 Cst.)
Detention Upheld in Drug Trafficking Case Due to Flight Risk and Ongoing Investigation
Cited as the constitutional basis requiring proportionality for deprivation of liberty.
CPR 2022 93 · ju (art. 36 al. 1 Cst.)
Defendant's Appeal of Pre-Trial Detention Order Denied
Requirement for provisional detention to be based on a legal provision.
CPR 2022 75 · ju (Art. 36 al. 1 Cst.)
Pre-trial Detention Upheld Due to Flight and Reoffending Risks
Underpins the legality of restrictions on fundamental rights, including liberty, through pre-trial detention.