Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
101 CH-JU

Art. 29 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura

1. État, peuple, autorités » 10. Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (154 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 29 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura

1 Sont obligatoires les assurances en cas de maladie, d'accident et de maternité.

2 L'Etat favorise la prise en charge du coût des soins dentaires par l'assurance maladie.

← Art. 28 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura 1. État, peuple, autorités » 10. Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux Art. 30 Constitution de la République et Canton du Jura →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (124)

CC 2025 45 · ju (art. 29 al. 1 Cst.)
Mootness of Denial of Justice Claim Due to Scheduled Hearing
Cited as the constitutional guarantee of a fair hearing and judgment within a reasonable time.
CP 2024 40 · ju (Art. 29 al. 1 Cst.)
Coercion Conviction Upheld for Zurich Protest, Penalty Waived Due to Judicial Delay
Cited as a guarantee for the right to have one's case heard within a reasonable time, in the context of the violation of the principle of promptness.
ADM 2024 191 · ju (Art. 29 al. 2 Cst.)
Right to be Heard in Guardianship Proceedings
Cited as the constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard, which includes the right to express oneself on relevant elements before a decision is made.
ADM 2024 158 · ju (art. 29 al. 3 Cst.)
Court Upholds Transfer to Open Correctional Facility for Therapeutic Treatment
This constitutional article is cited as the basis for the right to free legal aid.
ADM 2024 63 · ju (Art. 29 al. 3 Cst.)
Legal Aid Repayment Not Waived Due to Improved Financial Status and Insufficient Expense Documentation
Guarantees the right to legal aid for those who lack sufficient resources, provided their cause is not devoid of any chance of success.
ADM 2024 152 · ju (Art. 29 al. 1 Cst.)
Child Protection Case Appeal: Court Denies Suspension, Sets Deadline
Cited to underline the principle of timely judgment and its limits on suspending procedures.
CC 2024 31 · ju (Art. 29 al. 2 Cst.)
Attorney Fee Dispute in Divorce Case
Est invoqué pour rappeler l'obligation de motiver les décisions, bien que non directement appliquée dans les ordres.
ADM 2023 125 · ju (art. 29 al. 1 Cst.)
Rifle Seizure Unreasonable Due to Passage of Time
Cited to emphasize the principle of fair and timely treatment of cases.
ADM 2024 20 · ju (art. 29 al. 3 Cst.)
Child Visitation Transportation Dispute
Provides the legal basis for the right to legal aid for individuals who lack sufficient resources.
ADM 2023 126 · ju (art. 29 al. 2 Cst.)
Child Custody and Visitation Dispute: Provisional Authority Decision Upheld
Cited as the constitutional basis for the right to be heard.
ADM 2023 105 · ju (Art. 29 al. 3 Cst.)
Curatorship upheld for alcoholic due to inability to manage affairs
Cited as the basis for granting the appellant legal aid.
ADM 2023 71 · ju (Art. 29 al. 1 Cst.)
Hedge Restoration and Construction Permit Validity
Cited to address the applicant's claim of a denial of justice, stating that authorities must process cases fairly and judge them within a reasonable time.
ADM 2023 71 · ju (Art. 29 al. 2 Cst.)
Hedge Restoration and Construction Permit Validity
Cited in relation to the right to be heard, particularly the obligation of authorities to motivate their decisions and the right to offer evidence.
ADM 2023 52 · ju (Art. 29 al. 3 Cst.)
Derivative Residency Permit Denied Due to Lack of Deep Integration and Husband's Expired Permit
Cited as the constitutional basis for the right to free legal aid for individuals without sufficient resources.
CPR 2023 73 · ju (art. 29 al. 2 Cst.)
Domestic Dispute Defendant's Provisional Detention Upheld Due to Risk of Reoffending
Cited in relation to the possibility of referring to previous decisions in motivating detention prolongation requests.