Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II DoR 89/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.89.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review application because conditions under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act are not met.

Numéro de cause Sklep II DoR 89/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a review against the second-instance court's decision. The applicant sought full compensation for a violation of the right to a trial within a reasonable time, while the lower courts had partially granted and partially denied the claim. The court denied the review application because the specific conditions required by Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not satisfied.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review application is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision contains a violation of law or a significant error in fact-finding that justifies a retrial.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
review application Civil Procedure Act reasonable time compensation claim admissibility criteria frais de la procédure valeur litigieuse minimale préjudice financier différentiel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Généré par l'IA
VSC sodba Cp 498/2016
Appeal dismissed; court upheld low compensation for six-year trial delay under small claims procedure rules.
VSL sklep II Cp 2450/2009
Appeal dismissed; prior Ombudsman procedure mandatory prerequisite for State Compensation claims under ZVPSBNO.
VSL sodba I Cpg 622/2012
Court allows contract ratified by management despite initial lack of authorized representation.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 225/2019
Court dismissed appeal against employer's liability for employee's unauthorized payment of traffic fine using employer's card.
VSM sklep I Cpg 172/2015
Appeal dismissed; defendant must pay costs after admitting debt only after enforcement proceedings began.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predlog se zavrže.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je tožniku prisodilo 1.500,00 EUR odškodnine zaradi kršitve pravice do sojenja v razumnem roku, v presežku (do 8.300,00 EUR) pa je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo. Sodišče druge stopnje je tožnikovi pritožbi delno ugodilo in odškodnino zvišalo na 2.500,00 EUR, zavrnilno sodbo nad tem zneskom pa je potrdilo.

2. Tožnik je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje v tistem delu, v katerem je njegov zahtevek pravnomočno zavrnjen. Zavzema se za celotno zahtevano odškodnino. Sporna je torej samo višina le-te.

3. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, zato je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.