Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II DoR 169/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.169.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed review request as statutory conditions for admissibility were not met.

Numéro de cause Sklep II DoR 169/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the plaintiffs' request for permission to file a review against the second-instance judgment. The plaintiffs argued for compensation, but the second-instance court upheld the first-instance dismissal of their claim. The court denied the review because the specific conditions required by Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review request is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admissibility are not fulfilled.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
review request admissibility conditions Code of Civil Procedure supreme court dismissal of claim motifs de révision motivation du revirement jurisprudentiel opposition au commandement de payer

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
Sklep II DoR 237/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request because court fee was paid after the legal deadline expired.
Sklep III DoR 109/2010
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for most questions due to procedural defects and lack of importance.
Sklep III DoR 36/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a contract terminated before bankruptcy counts as a mutual breach under ZFPPIPP Article 24.
Sklep X Ips 92/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming procedural merger is a significant legal issue under ZUS-1.
Sklep III DoR 31/2014
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding legal basis for compensation and civil penalty calculation for public broadcasting of sound recordings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP niso izpolnjeni, je VS RS predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožniki so vložili predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, s katero je bila potrjena sodba prvostopenjskega sodišča o zavrnitvi njihovega odškodninskega tožbenega zahtevka.

2. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso izpolnjeni, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena istega zakona).