Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II DoR 114/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.114.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to non-fulfillment of statutory conditions under Civil Procedure Act.

Numéro de cause Sklep II DoR 114/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal, upholding the lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit and cost allocation. The applicant argued for further review, but the court found that the legal prerequisites for granting an appeal permission were not met. Consequently, the request was denied pursuant to the specific provisions of the Civil Procedure Act regarding appeal thresholds.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act: An appeal permission request is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Civil Procedure Act appeal permission statutory conditions dismissal of request Supreme Court review vice de procédure échelonnement de la procédure action échelonnée

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Généré par l'IA
VDSS sklep Psp 425/2011
Appeal dismissed; court enforcement of pension award not a direct social court matter.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 213/2023
Appeal dismissed; creditor lacks interest in mortgage suit when direct enforcement is already attempted and failed due to property exemption.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1471/2015
Contractual penalty upheld where parties knew deadline was impossible due to undefined scope.
Sklep II Ips 386/2008
Appeal dismissed because no single claim exceeds 1 million SIT despite multiple distinct factual bases.
VSL sklep I Cpg 322/2012
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by rejecting correctable defect in naming the defendant instead of ordering correction.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni zakonski pogoji, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo tožnikovo pritožbo in potrdilo sklepa sodišča prve stopnje, s katerima je bila zavržena tožba in tožniku naloženo plačilo stroškov postopka vsakega od tožencev.

2. Zoper navedeni sklep je tožnik vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).