Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II DoR 162/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.162.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal permission request due to non-fulfillment of statutory conditions under Civil Procedure Act.

Numéro de cause Sklep II DoR 162/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal, upholding the lower court's judgment ordering compensation payments. The applicant argued for a review, but the court found that the legal prerequisites for granting such permission under the Civil Procedure Act were not met. Consequently, the decision was based on the strict statutory requirements for appellate review, which the applicant failed to satisfy.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

367.a(1) CPP; 367.c(2) CPP: A request for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
permission to appeal Civil Procedure Act statutory conditions dismissed request appellate review calcul de l'indemnité réparatrice versement de dommages-intérêts frais de retard

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
367.a(1) of the Civil Procedure Act
367.c(2) of the Civil Procedure Act
Généré par l'IA
VSL sodba I Cp 2416/2014
Court dismisses defamation claim against satirical article, upholding freedom of expression limits.
VSL Sklep II Cp 2411/2017
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay defendant's legal costs despite procedural objections.
VDSS sodba Pdp 471/2014
Workplace injury claim dismissed; employee's own unsafe climbing caused accident without employer liability.
Sodba in sklep II Ips 406/2006
Civil court dismisses appeal on property damages due to statutory limits but allows appeal on non-property damages.
VSL sodba II Cp 453/2009
Civil court dismissed appeal, bound by final criminal verdict on accident facts until criminal case is reopened.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni zakonski pogoji, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo toženkino pritožbo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, po kateri je vsakemu od tožnikov dolžna plačati odškodnino v višini 2.086,46 EUR z zahtevanimi obrestmi in jima povrniti stroške postopka.

2. Zoper navedeno sodbo je toženka vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku)