Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep VIII DoR 12/2009-5 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:VIII.DOR.12.2009.5 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request as no conditions for review under ZPP Art. 367a exist.

Numéro de cause Sklep VIII DoR 12/2009-5
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit an appeal against a final labor court judgment. The applicant sought compensation for lost work rights due to shortened working hours, but the lower courts upheld the dismissal of this claim. The Supreme Court found that the statutory conditions for allowing a review under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not met.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review appeal is not permitted when the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision was based on a violation of law or a significant error in fact-finding.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Civil Procedure Act review appeal shortened working hours lost work rights labor compensation final judgment Supreme Court modification des conditions financières

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Généré par l'IA
Sodba VIII Ips 196/2004
Supreme Court partially allows unemployment benefit claim for business owner seeking new employment under ZPIZ.
VDSS sodba Psp 372/2008
Appeal allowed; change in disability status terminated waiting unemployment benefit entitlement under ZPIZ.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 913/2018
Appeal dismissed; employer liable for seniority bonus from filing date due to statutory default rule.
VDS sodba Psp 577/2007
Court allows appeal, quashing administrative decision for failing to distinguish new claim from final ruling.
VDS sodba in sklep Pdp 60/2001
Court partially allows appeal on monthly wage minimums and travel expenses in labor dispute.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Na podlagi navedb tožnika v predlogu za dopustitev revizije Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da ne obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek tožnika, da mu je tožena stranka dolžna plačati prikrajšanje iz naslova priznanja pravice do dela v skrajšanem delovnem času za čas od 1. 2. 2001 do 7. 11. 2006 v znesku 23.113,58 EUR s pripadajočimi zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 18. 11. 2006 do plačila. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

2. Na podlagi navedb tožnika v predlogu za dopustitev revizije zoper pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije ugotavlja, da ne obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP.