Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
Încheierea nr. 511/2013 Généré par l'IA

Motion to transfer venue admitted; case reassigned to Zalău District Court with prior acts preserved.

Numéro de cause Încheierea nr. 511/2013
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the motion to transfer venue filed by the petitioner, ordering that the civil case underlying File No. 3117/246/2012 be transferred from the Ineu District Court to the Zalău District Court, while preserving all acts performed before the transfer; this decision is final and without appeal. The case arose from a request by a company's branch to relocate a pending civil proceeding, with the assigned judge and the Public Ministry supporting the motion. Legally, the court applied the provisions on case transfer under the applicable civil procedure code, considering the procedural posture (the underlying file had been stayed) and the grounds favoring a change of venue, with the Ministerul Public concurring in the admission of the request.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ; Motion to transfer venue admitted; case reassigned to Zalău District Court with prior acts preserved: 3117/246/2012 be transferred from the Ineu District Court to the Zalău District Court, while preserving all acts performed before the transfer; this decision is final and without appeal. The case arose from a request by a company's branch to relocate a pending civil proceeding, with the assigned judge and the Public Ministry supporting the motion. Legally, the court applied the provisions on case transfer under the applicable civil procedure code, considering the procedural posture (the underlying file had been stayed) and the grounds favoring a change of venue, with the Ministerul Public concurring in the admission of the request.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
code de procédure civile motifs de cassation décisions incidentes transfert de bail motif de police e-justice

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

Cited in the reasoning to note the case was suspended; not cited in the dispositive orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta SC R.I.F.N. SA - sucursala Arad.

La apelul nominal lipsesc petenta SC R.I.F.N. SA - sucursala Arad, intimații I.L., B.E.J. - D.D.M.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror L.V.

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul ce face obiectul cererii de strămutare a fost suspendat în temeiul dispozițiilor art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ. din data de 29 noiembrie 2012.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de admitere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta SC R.I.F.N. SA - sucursala Arad privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 3117/246/2012 al Judecătoriei Ineu.

Strămută judecata cauzei de la Judecătoria Ineu la Judecătoria Zalău.

Păstrează actele îndeplinite de instanță înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 6 februarie 2013.