Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ICCJ_86957 Généré par l'IA

Preliminary ruling referral on restitution law interplay rejected as inadmissible.

Numéro de cause ICCJ_86957
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the referral from the Court of Appeal of Iași seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and application of Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 31, 33, and 35 of Law No. 165/2013, as amended, in relation to Laws No. 10/2001 and No. 247/2005 regarding restitution of property in cases pending before courts. The referral was dismissed as inadmissible, meaning the lower court's request for a preliminary ruling was not accepted on procedural grounds. The dispute involved a request for clarification on how the 2013 restitution framework law interacts with earlier restitution laws in pending cases. The decisive legal basis was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral under the rules governing preliminary rulings, specifically failing to meet the admissibility criteria for such referrals, with the decision rendered binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010).

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013; Preliminary ruling referral on restitution law interplay rejected as inadmissible: 165/2013, as amended, in relation to Laws No. 10/2001 and No. 247/2005 regarding restitution of property in cases pending before courts. The referral was dismissed as inadmissible, meaning the lower court's request for a preliminary ruling was not accepted on procedural grounds. The dispute involved a request for clarification on how the 2013 restitution framework law interacts with earlier restitution laws in pending cases. The decisive legal basis was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral under the rules governing preliminary rulings, specifically failing to meet the admissibility criteria for such referrals, with the decision rendered binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010).

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédure préjudicielle restitution de la propriété décision préjudicielle motifs de cassation interprétation des lois article du CPC

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013
33, art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013 cu modificările si completările ulterioare, pentru cauzele aflate pe rolul instanţelor, raportat la dispoziţiile Legii nr.
Généré par l'IA
ICCJ_156003
Preliminary property-restitution referral dismissed as inadmissible; deadlines left uninterpreted
ICCJ_140169
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible; courts cannot substitute judgment for restitution order under Law 165/2013.
ICCJ_187724
Restitution referral on Law 165/2013 valuation held inadmissible.
ICCJ_201038
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible for lacking genuine interpretive difficulty; prior land restitution decisions stand.
ICCJ_155123
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling request on restitution priority and compulsory land compensation under Law 165/2013

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedura civila adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010

Declared the referral binding and mandatory for the courts.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE SI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 8 Dosar nr. 6/1/2014/HP/C

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibila sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Iaşi, în dosarul nr. 11361/99/2011*, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare si aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 4, art. 5, art. 6, art. 7, art. 8, art. 9, art. 11, art. 12, art. 14, art. 16, art. 17, art. 20, art. 21, art. 22, art. 24, art. 25, art. 27, art. 31, art. 33, art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013 cu modificările si completările ulterioare, pentru cauzele aflate pe rolul instanţelor, raportat la dispoziţiile Legii nr. 10/2001 republicata, cu modificările si completările ulterioare si ale Legii nr. 247/2005 cu modificările si completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedura civila adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010.

Pronunţata în ședința publică, astăzi 7 iulie 2014.