II PK 181/10
Généré par l'IA
Criminal record check refusal damages claim allowed; appeal costs ruling inadmissible to Supreme Court.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the employer's refusal to hire the plaintiff due to a missing criminal record declaration. The court held that such a refusal constitutes a violation of equal treatment principles, allowing the claim for damages. However, the appeal regarding the appellate court's ruling on first-instance costs was declared inadmissible because the Supreme Court can only review costs decisions made in the final appeal judgment.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 6 pkt 10 ustawy o Krajowym Rejestrze Karnym; Art. 3941 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal against a second-instance court's decision on first-instance costs is inadmissible as it does not constitute a new cost ruling by the first instance.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
equal treatment violation
criminal record check
employment discrimination
cassation appeal dismissal
costs of proceedings
inadmissible appeal
reformatory judgment
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 6 pkt 10 ustawy z dnia 24 maja 2000 r. o Krajowym Rejestrze Karnym
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3941 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
Art. 373 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 221 § 1 k.p
art. 3 k.p
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IApostanowienia Sądu Najwyższy z dnia 23 czerwca 2010 r., II CZ 45/10
postanowienia Sądu Najwyższy z dnia 24 września 2010 r., IV CZ 60/10
I PK 212/08
Supreme Court corrects school director appointment date based on statutory six-month vacancy period rules.