Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I UK 295/09 Généré par l'IA

Academic teacher entitled to salary during justified absence, not social insurance benefits, per Higher Education Law.

Numéro de cause I UK 295/09
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the university's cassation appeal against the Social Insurance Institution's decision regarding an academic teacher's benefits. The court found that while the teacher was entitled to salary for the first 33 days of justified absence, she had no right to social insurance benefits for the subsequent period. The court rejected the university's argument that comparing different statutes would create a hybrid system, affirming that the Higher Education Law establishes a distinct rule where salary replaces social benefits after the initial period.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 154 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2005 r. - Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym; An academic teacher is entitled to salary for the first 33 days of justified absence but has no right to social insurance benefits for the remainder of the period.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
academic teacher salary justified absence social insurance benefits Higher Education Law maternity leave systematic interpretation unjustified absence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 154 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2005 r. - Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym
Art. 92 k.p.
art. 92 k.p
art. 92 § 1 k.p
art. 180 k.p
art. 39814 k.p.c
art. 98 k.p.c

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet