Supreme Court allows partial appeal regarding school director dismissal damages but dismisses procedural violation claims raised ex officio.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court partially overturned the lower court's judgment, setting aside the award for damages related to the unlawful dismissal of a school director while dismissing the appellant's procedural complaints. The appellant argued that the first-instance court failed to inform him of a specific legal interpretation, yet the appellate court had not raised this issue during the appeal. The court ruled that the second-instance judge cannot consider procedural violations ex officio unless the appeal explicitly challenges them, as the appeal focused solely on the substantive damages claim.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 378 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; The second-instance court, when adjudicating on appeal, is bound by the scope of the appeal and cannot consider procedural violations committed by the first-instance court ex officio unless such violations are explicitly raised in the appeal.