Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PK 226/07 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation complaints regarding collective agreement interpretation and procedural suspension rules.

Numéro de cause I PK 226/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed both parties' cassation complaints against the lower court's judgment in a labor dispute over unpaid wage increases. The plaintiff sought payment based on a collective agreement that was not fully implemented, while the defendants argued against the interpretation of their joint liability. The court held that the lower court's sentence phrasing did not constitute a legal error and that the procedural suspension regarding the hospital's dissolution was correctly resumed upon the plaintiff's designation of the successor entity.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 k.c.; Art. 59 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP; Art. 9 k.p.; The interpretation of a collective agreement as a source of labor law cannot be questioned solely on the basis of a poorly phrased sentence in the judgment, and procedural suspension due to loss of legal capacity is validly resumed upon the plaintiff's designation of the legal successor.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
collective agreement interpretation joint liability in labor law procedural suspension resumption legal successor designation cassation complaint dismissal labor dispute wage increase source of labor law

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 k.c.
Art. 59 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP
Art. 9 k.p.
Art. 174 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 180 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 65 k.c
art. 59 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 9 k.p
art. 9 § 1 k.p

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet