Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II PK 293/06 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court voids appeal proceedings when a co-defendant formally appeals against a judgment not addressed to them.

Numéro de cause II PK 293/06
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court declared the appeal proceedings void because the Court of Appeal ruled against a defendant based solely on an appeal filed by a co-defendant. The lower court had issued a final judgment against one entity while ignoring the appeal lodged by another formal co-defendant regarding a different party. The court held that a co-defendant can only appeal their own judgment, making the appeal procedurally inadmissible and the subsequent ruling void.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 370 k.p.c.; Art. 373 k.p.c.; Art. 379 k.p.c.; Art. 398 k.p.c.; Art. 3982 k.p.c.; Art. 386 k.p.c. - An appeal filed by a formal co-defendant against a judgment not addressed to them is inadmissible, rendering the second-instance proceedings void and the resulting judgment ineffective.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inadmissible appeal formal co-defendant void proceedings final judgment procedural defect

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 370 k.p.c.
Art. 373 k.p.c.
Art. 379 k.p.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.
Art. 3982 k.p.c.
Art. 386 k.p.c.
art. 231 § 1 k.p
art. 386 §1 k.p.c
art. 363 § 1 k.p
art. 3982 § 2 pkt 2 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
III CZP 34/91 OSNCP 1992 nr 2, poz. 24
III PK 7/04 OSNP 2005 nr 2, poz. 21
III CZP 25/67
III CZP 34/91
III PK 7/04
Supreme Court dissent argues for remand due to lack of specific party claims and unnamed joint participation.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet