I PK 232/06
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; driving time is work time; no free hotel means no travel allowance.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by employees against a labor court judgment regarding unpaid wages and travel allowances. The court upheld the lower court's finding that driving time constitutes work time and that a flat-rate travel allowance was due because the employer failed to provide free accommodation. The decision relied on the principle that the employer's failure to offer suitable lodging meant the statutory flat-rate reimbursement applied, despite procedural errors in the lower court's reasoning.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 128 k.p.; § 9 ust. 4 rozporządzenia z dnia 3 lipca 1998 r.: Driving time is work time; a flat-rate travel allowance applies when the employer does not provide free accommodation suitable for rest.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
driving time as work
travel allowance flat rate
free accommodation requirement
labor dispute wages
cassation appeal dismissal
employee travel costs
employer liability
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 128 k.p.
§ 9 ust. 4 rozporządzenia z dnia 3 lipca 1998 r. w sprawie zasad ustalania oraz wysokości należności przysługujących pracownikom z tytułu podróży służbowej poza granicami kraju
art. 386 § 6 k.p.c.
art. 3983 pkt 2 k.p.c.
art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 128 k.p
art. 386 § 6 k.p.c
art. 775 k.p
art. 3983 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c