I PK 124/06 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation appeal as alleged procedural defects did not affect plaintiff's rights.

Numéro de cause I PK 124/06

Autorité / Tribunal Sąd Najwyższy

Juridiction

Pologne (PL)

Date de la décision 2006-12-11

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against the labor court's rejection of her wage claim. The plaintiff argued that the employer's unauthorized representation by its president violated procedural rules regarding the opposing party's interests. The court ruled that such alleged defects did not impact the plaintiff's rights and that no special circumstances justified the Supreme Court conducting evidence on its own.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 232 ust. 2 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal based on procedural violations affecting the opposing party is admissible only if the defect rendered the proceedings void, and the Supreme Court may conduct evidence only in exceptional cases where the defect actually impaired the appellant's rights.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

cassation appeal dismissal procedural defects labor law representation evidence on its own opposing party rights

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 232 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 31 § 1 k.p.

art. 68 k.p

art. 87 § 2 k.p.c

art. 379 pkt 2 k.p.c

art. 87 § 1 k.p.c

art. 386 § 2 k.p.c

art. 89 § 1 k.p.c

art. 126 § 3 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows labor law case against company president, correcting procedural and substantive errors by lower courts.

Supreme Court quashes labor court verdict for reinstatement due to procedural errors and incomplete evidence assessment.

Supreme Court dismissed cassation; oral agreement on new post implies consent to reduced salary without premium.

Employer has legal interest in appealing dismissal verdict if court finds no grounds for termination without notice.

Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling evidence requests in cassation to change facts are inadmissible delays.

III CKN 416/98

III CZP 4/00

IV CK 661/03

Supreme Court voids appeal judgment for lack of valid power of attorney and remands case.

Bankruptcy law ruling: Lawyer's self-certified registry copy suffices for corporate creditor's power of attorney.

Texte complet