Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II PK 165/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows overtime claim under task system, rejecting appeal on evidence failure.

Numéro de cause II PK 165/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court partially allowed the plaintiff's overtime claim against the defendant company, modifying the lower court's judgment on interest and specific amounts. The court found that under the task-based work system, the employer must prove tasks were executable within standard hours, and the evidence clearly showed the plaintiff worked beyond the agreed 42-hour week. The appeal was dismissed because the defendant failed to provide new evidence to contradict the established facts, and the court ruled that the task system does not automatically exempt employers from overtime liability if work exceeds statutory norms.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 140 k.p.; Art. 129 k.p.; Art. 381 k.p.c.; Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 81 k.p. The employer applying a task-based work system must demonstrate that assigned tasks were executable within standard working hours; failure to produce evidence in the first instance precludes raising this objection on appeal, and work exceeding the contractual norm constitutes overtime regardless of the task system.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
task-based work system overtime compensation evidence failure appeal standard working hours labor law dispute

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 140 k.p.
Art. 129 k.p.
Art. 381 k.p.c.
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 81 k.p.
Art. 392 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 140 k.p
art. 129 k.p
art. 381 k.p.c
art. 129 § 1 k.p

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet