I UZP 3/05
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismisses legal question as interpretation already established by prior precedent.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court of Poland refused to issue a ruling on a legal question regarding the withdrawal of a farmer's pension. The applicant argued that failing to disclose all land in a notarial deed invalidated the pension, while the court noted the lower court did not cite alternative interpretations. Consequently, the court declined to rule because the statutory interpretation was already definitively established in previous decisions.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 61 § 1 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym: The Supreme Court may decline to rule on a legal question if the interpretation of the cited provisions has already been established by prior Supreme Court jurisprudence.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
legal question dismissal
precedent interpretation
pension withdrawal
farmer's pension
notarial deed formalities
Supreme Court procedure
statutory interpretation
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 61 § 1 ustawy z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
ustawa z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników indywidualnych i członków ich rodzin
ustawa z dnia 27 października 1977 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym oraz innych świadczeniach dla rolników i ich rodzin
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 58 § 1 k.c
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAIII CZP 136/91
II CZP 89/86