II PK 386/04
Généré par l'IA
Social package employment guarantee deemed contrary to social coexistence rules in privatization context.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim to reinstate employment based on a social package signed during state enterprise privatization. The court found that while the social package claimed to be a source of labor law, its binding nature was not established by the parties' intent or statutory incorporation. Consequently, the court ruled that the package's provisions could not override the general principle of social coexistence in this specific privatization scenario.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 9 § 1 k.p.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c. - A social package guaranteeing employment during privatization may be deemed contrary to the principles of social coexistence if it lacks a legal basis derived from the parties' will or statutory incorporation.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
social package
labor law source
privatization guarantee
social coexistence
employment reinstatement
collective agreement
interpretation of law
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 9 § 1 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 65 k.c.
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 68 k.p
art. 97 § 2 k.p
art. 26 k.p
art. 97 § 1 k.p
art. 60 k.c
art. 224 § 1 k.p.c