III PK 14/05
Généré par l'IA
Dismissal of discrimination claim where dismissal for serious duty breach is not unequal treatment.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal against a warning and suspension from medical duty shifts. The employee argued that excluding him from shifts for refusing to visit a patient constituted discrimination under labor law. The court held that such exclusion was a legitimate response to a serious breach of duties, not an impermissible discriminatory criterion.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 112, Art. 113 k.p.: Dismissal of an employee from duty shifts due to a serious breach of obligations does not constitute discrimination or unequal treatment.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
labor law
discrimination
unequal treatment
serious breach
medical duty
employee obligations
cassation appeal
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 112 k.p.
Art. 113 k.p.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 113 k.p
art. 112 k.p
art. 81 k.p
art. 1131 k.p