III ZP 13/00
Généré par l'IA
Labor law claim dismissed by court for not raising statute of limitations objection on its own motion.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court ruled that labor courts must not consider the statute of limitations ex officio but only upon the debtor's objection. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred by dismissing the claim based on the expiration of the limitation period without a formal objection. The court rejected this, stating that the statutory language requires the debtor to actively invoke the defense, and the court lacks the authority to apply it sua sponte.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 292 KP; Art. 117 § 2 KC: The statute of limitations in labor law claims must be raised by the debtor as a defense; the court does not consider it ex officio.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
statute of limitations
labor law claims
ex officio consideration
debtor's defense
limitation period
labor code provisions
procedural objection
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 292 KP
Art. 117 § 2 KC
Art. 5 KC
Art. 8 KP