Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
III RN 106/99 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows third party payment of court costs, ruling personal payment not required by law.

Numéro de cause III RN 106/99
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court overturned the Administrative Court's dismissal of a tax appeal, ruling that a third party's payment of court fees was valid. The Administrative Court had rejected the appeal because the company, lacking assets, failed to pay the fee personally, instead having a partner deposit it. The Supreme Court held that Article 5 of the Civil Court Costs Act does not require personal payment, allowing the third party to fulfill the obligation on behalf of the company.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 5 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych; Art. 27 ust. 1 i ust. 2 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym: The obligation to pay court costs applies to the party filing the document, but the law does not restrict the fulfillment of this obligation to personal payment by that party, permitting a third party to act on their behalf.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
third party payment court costs obligation administrative litigation personal payment requirement civil procedure costs supreme court review tax appeal dismissal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 5 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 13 czerwca 1967 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 27 ust. 1 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 27 ust. 2 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 36 ust. 3 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet