Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UKN 247/98 Généré par l'IA

Cassation dismissed as inadmissible because the second-instance court failed to rule on the plaintiff's full claim without a request for supplementation.

Numéro de cause II UKN 247/98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal filed by Andrzej K. against a partial judgment in an employment accident compensation case. The lower court altered the first-instance ruling but omitted a decision on the plaintiff's remaining claim for increased disability compensation, which neither party requested to be supplemented. The court held that since no party asked for the judgment to be completed within the statutory period, the cassation targeted a non-existent ruling and was therefore inadmissible under the Civil Procedure Code.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 351, art. 3938 KPC: If a court of the second instance fails to rule on the entirety of a party's claim without a request for supplementation, a cassation appeal against such a partial judgment is inadmissible as it targets a non-existent ruling.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inadmissible cassation partial judgment supplementation request non-existent ruling Civil Procedure Code employment accident disability compensation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 351 KPC
art. 3938 KPC

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
C 1040/52
4 CR 1188/56
I PR 10/63
I PR 75/71
II URN 144/82
II CKN 15/97
I CZ 76/97
I CKU 51/97
III CZ 43/98
II URN 136/82
III PZP 14/72
uchwała z dnia 30 kwietnia 1966 r., III PZP 15/66

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet