Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PKN 106/98 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows damages instead of reinstatement for union worker fired for drunkenness after employer violated union protection rules.

Numéro de cause I PKN 106/98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the union worker's claim for reinstatement due to procedural violations by the employer. The worker, a union official, was fired for refusing sobriety tests and returning to work while intoxicated, but the employer failed to obtain necessary union committee consent before termination. The court ruled that while the worker's conduct justified dismissal, the employer's breach of union protection statutes prevented a total denial of the claim, mandating damages instead.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 8 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych: Where an employer violates statutory union protection procedures regarding the dismissal of a union official, the employee may claim damages under Art. 56 KP rather than reinstatement, as the employer's procedural breach negates the grounds for total dismissal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
union official dismissal drunkenness at work reinstatement damages union protection statutes procedural violation labor law appeal employee rights

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 8 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 477 1 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 56 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 393 13 § 1 zdanie pierwsze Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PZP 19/96

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet