Supreme Court dismisses appeal because cited procedural rules were repealed before the second-instance judgment was issued.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Edward S. against a second-instance judgment regarding agricultural disability pension. The appellant argued that the appellate court failed to order specific medical examinations and appoint a neurologist, violating procedural codes. The court ruled that the specific articles cited by the appellant had been repealed by a new law effective July 1, 1996, which occurred after the contested judgment was rendered. Consequently, the appeal lacked a valid legal basis as it relied on provisions that were no longer in force at the time of the judgment.