Supreme Court dismissed cassation for citing substantive law not used as the basis for the lower court's decision.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against the appellate court's rejection of her unpaid wages claim. The plaintiff argued that the appellate court erred in applying Article 177 of the Commercial Code to characterize her actions as non-monetary contributions rather than employment duties. The court ruled that this provision was merely cited in the reasoning but did not serve as the actual legal basis for the decision, which relied solely on the termination of the employment relationship.