II UKN 26/96
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to exclusion of crucial medical evidence affecting disability pension outcome.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Henryk K. against a lower court's denial of his disability pension. The appellant argued that the exclusion of new expert medical opinions violated procedural rules and distorted the factual findings regarding his condition. The court rejected this claim, noting that the existing evidence was sufficient to determine that his pre-existing conditions did not constitute disability at the time of the decision.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 11 ust. 3 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: The exclusion of evidence on disputed facts having significant importance for the case constitutes a violation of essential procedural rules that may justify cassation if it could have decisively influenced the outcome.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
disability pension
exclusion of evidence
cassation appeal
procedural violation
expert medical opinion
factual findings
disability assessment
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAart. 11 ust. 3 of the Act of 1 March 1996 on amending the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 393 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 23 and 24 ust. 2 of the Act of 14 December 1982 on pension provision for employees and their families