II UKN 24/96
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal for failure to state grounds and justify legal violations under Civil Procedure Code.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the applicant failed to specify the grounds for cassation and justify the alleged procedural violations. The applicant challenged a lower court's refusal to grant early retirement based on insufficient work history, arguing factual errors regarding employment at a farm. The court ruled that without specific grounds and a detailed explanation of the legal breach, the appeal cannot be substantively examined and must be rejected as inadmissible.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 393 § 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 12 k.p.c.; A cassation appeal must clearly state its grounds and justify the alleged violation of law or procedure; failure to do so renders the appeal inadmissible and precludes substantive review.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
cassation appeal
inadmissible grounds
Civil Procedure Code
procedural violation
justification requirement
substantive review
dismissal of appeal
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAart. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 5 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 8 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 11 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAC.III 31/37