Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UZ 7/96 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on retrial order, ruling it ends proceedings and requires lawyer representation.

Numéro de cause II UZ 7/96
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's order rejecting a retrial request. The appellant argued the lower court erred in characterizing the order as non-final, yet the Court held that such orders conclude proceedings under Article 392 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the appellant failed to file a cassation through a lawyer within the statutory deadline.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 392 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: An order rejecting a request for retrial concludes the proceedings and is subject to cassation, but the appeal must be filed by a lawyer within the prescribed time limit.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
retrial request concluding order cassation appeal lawyer representation statutory deadline code of civil procedure procedural defect

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 385 KPC
Art. 392 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 2 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 4 KPC
Art. 397 § 2 KPC
Art. 399 KPC
Art. 401 KPC
Art. 403 KPC
Art. 410 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet