Court dismissed criminal appeal against conviction for theft, rejecting claim of insufficient evidence regarding stolen goods. The court upheld the original verdict based on established facts and procedural compliance. The defendant's arguments regarding the nature of the stolen items were rejected by the appellate court.
Estonie (EE)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Viru County Court of Appeal dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the defendant against his conviction for theft. The defendant argued that the evidence regarding the specific stolen goods was insufficient and that the original trial court erred in its assessment of the facts. The court rejected these claims, affirming that the lower court correctly established the material facts and applied the law properly, thus upholding the original judgment.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IACriminal Procedure Code § 249; Criminal Procedure Code § 250: The appellate court must uphold the original judgment if the lower court's findings of fact are supported by evidence and the legal application is correct, rejecting arguments based on insufficient evidence regarding the nature of the stolen property.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IATexte complet
!!"# $ %&' #()(' ( &( * + #,'-, .(/ 01 $!# %222$ / (/!%$!& !!#3 !(! !!#$!%44% /5#%!!6! % 5#%! (( %!%#%!' % (%"!# !"# $% # && '()* ) +
),-& .+ (/ ,( (,,* * %&!(!%#! # " %/ !##%(,%$ !" % !##!% '# #% %!%& %#!7!%&!8-! ' ##%! %%! #%&!#!'-,(! %-! %$ 0 !!"% * !%%!(- %/ %- %' ! %!%% % %/ !##%(,%$ &%% ! %%(#%!##!#(
!##%(,! %&! #( %% % (%!#! -%%!/ #%!9 &-%%
!##%( !%% ! %#! 9 -! ' #$ #%! -! %$ &# % ( %&!(!%#!#%!#! % (%!#!%% &! -%%!/ * %!!" %%!% %%/'#/!$%!(/%!' %!&--&!&% /!#!# ((,' (//! --%!&!(!%#!!/% +#,'++ #()(' * %(