Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
SS-2400/2008-ODE ECLI:DK:ODE:2024:SS0000000350 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses prosecution for assault on 11-year-old son and rejects compelled testimony request.

Numéro de cause SS-2400/2008-ODE
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the prosecution for assault against the defendant's 11-year-old son and rejected the request to compel the son's testimony under Section 171, Paragraph 3 of the Code of Judicial Procedure. The prosecution argued the assault occurred, while the defense contended the child's statement should not be forced. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the assault beyond reasonable doubt and that compelling a minor's testimony violated procedural protections.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Straffesagsloven § 171, stk. 3; Retsplejelovens § 171, stk. 3: The court may not compel a minor to give testimony in a criminal case without strict adherence to protective measures, and the prosecution bears the full burden of proving the alleged offense.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assault prosecution minor testimony compelled statement criminal procedure burden of proof child protection dismissal of charges âge de l'enfant

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Straffesagsloven § 171, stk. 3
Retsplejelovens § 171, stk. 3
Généré par l'IA
SS-324/2024-BOR
Court refuses to compel sister to testify against brother in sexual assault case due to family ties and mental health risks.
SS-1023/2025-QEQ
Guilty verdict for child abuse under Criminal Law § 88 despite defendant's denial of violence.
SS-3589/2023-OLR
Defendant convicted of rape by intercourse with own child under 15; appeal dismissed due to consistent witness testimony.
SS-80/2021-HJR
Supreme Court allows video testimony of abused child despite witness privilege claim due to public interest.
SS-1719/2008-OLR
Court rejects prosecution request for video interrogation without father's knowledge under Criminal Procedure Act.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Tiltale for vold mod 11-årig søn, og om det kan pålægges forurettede søn at afgive forklaring efter retsplejelovens § 171, stk 3