Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
SS-229/2022-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2023:SS0000001323 Généré par l'IA

Appeal dismissed as late; prosecution failed to meet strict time limits for enforcing Danish sentence.

Numéro de cause SS-229/2022-OLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Appeal dismissed the prosecution's appeal against the non-enforcement of a Danish sentence. The prosecution argued that the appeal was timely, but the court found it was filed too late under the EU sentence enforcement law. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural deadline had expired, preventing the enforcement of the foreign judgment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

EU-straffuldbyrdelseslovens § 54 a, stk. 4; retsplejelovens § 910, stk. 1: Appeals against decisions on the enforcement of foreign sentences must be lodged within strict statutory time limits, and failure to comply results in the dismissal of the appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
EU sentence enforcement procedural time limits appeal dismissal foreign judgment Danish criminal law délais de recours forclusion de l'action extension de la procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
EU-straffuldbyrdelseslovens § 54 a, stk. 4
EU-straffuldbyrdelseslovens § 54 a, stk. 4, jf.
retsplejelovens § 910, stk. 1
retsplejelovens § 910, stk. 1
Généré par l'IA
SS-483/2009-OLR
Appeal dismissed because prosecution failed to meet strict deadline for filing appeal against defendant.
BS-51637/2023-OLR
Appeal dismissed because lawyer lacked court access, but appeal allowed due to timely acceptance via email.
SS-1995/2008-OLR
Appeal after deadline dismissed because defendant was present at verdict and notified of appeal rules.
BS-1923/2016-OLR
Appeal allowed because digital filing after office hours counts as timely under new statute.
BS-1332/2008-OLR
Court allows ancillary party to submit lower court partial decision to resolve procedural prerequisite.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Landsretten afviste tiltaltes anke som for sent indgivet i sag om fuldbyrdelse af dom i Danmark, jf. EU-straffuldbyrdelseslovens § 54 a, stk. 4, jf. retsplejelovens § 910, stk. 1

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.