Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-1165/2010-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2023:BS0000004778 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses claim for damages against police for alleged excessive force during arrest.

Numéro de cause BS-1165/2010-VLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages alleging excessive force by police officers during an arrest. The plaintiff argued that the officers used unnecessary violence, while the defense contended the force was proportionate to the threat. The court ruled that the officers' actions were justified under the circumstances, thereby rejecting the compensation request.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Straffelovens § 29; § 1000, stk. 1, nr. 1; § 1000, stk. 2, nr. 1: Police use of force is lawful if proportionate to the threat, and damages are not awarded when the force meets this standard.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
police use of force excessive force claim proportionality principle criminal procedure law damages against state réexamen d'une décision antérieure réserve de révision mainlevée définitive

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Straffelovens § 29
§ 1000, stk. 1, nr. 1
§ 1000, stk. 2, nr. 1
Généré par l'IA
BS-28125/2023-VLR
Appeal dismissed because the lower court's ruling on suspensive effect requires Process Permission Board approval under § 389a.
BS-27589/2021-OLR
Appeal dismissed because plaintiff failed to file claims in the digital court portal as required by law.
SS-67/2014-HJR
Højesteret allows appeal against dismissal due to missing follow-up on original signed petition, remitting case for salary review.
BS-397/2011-OLR
Appeal court upholds lower court's decision to reopen a small claims case after default judgment. The court confirms the general right to request case reopening under the Code of Civil Procedure. The decision clarifies that small claims rules do not exclude the general reopening provision. The court notes the defendant requested reopening within the statutory time limit. The appeal court affirms the lower court's ruling on reopening the proceedings.
BS-9/2014-HJR
Court dismisses appeal on costs as original appeal covered entire lower court decision including costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Landsrettens afgørelse om at kæremålet afvises, tages ikke til følge