Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-1076/2011-ARH ECLI:DK:ARH:2023:BS0000003675 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses continued home exclusion claim as it lacks sufficient grounds for continued measure.

Numéro de cause BS-1076/2011-ARH
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the applicant's request to continue being excluded from their home and to limit visitation rights. The applicant argued that the exclusion was disproportionate and violated their right to family life, while the opposing party maintained the measure was necessary for public safety. The court ruled that the original justification for the exclusion had expired and no new evidence warranted its continuation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Social Service Act § 103; Social Service Act § 104: The court may terminate a continued home exclusion measure when the original grounds for the measure no longer exist or have been sufficiently mitigated.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
continued home exclusion social service act family life rights proportionality principle termination of measure stabilité des marchés financiers état stable modification de l'entretien

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Social Service Act § 103
Social Service Act § 104
Généré par l'IA
SS-4224/2020-ARH
Court rejects deportation revocation request despite family changes, citing insufficient impact on children's welfare.
BS-15738/2022-VLR
Court upholds family court order suspending visitation due to child's expressed refusal and psychological assessment.
BS-28000/2021-VLR
Family court dismissed father's appeal to revoke custody and terminate visitation rights.
BS-27283/2020-VIB
Court grants sole custody to father for one child and sole custody to mother for three children.
BS-3556/2014-OLR
Court allows father to file counter-claim for child return despite limited appeal permission. Father wins right to file claim. Court rules appeal permission covers entire judgment. Appeal permission covers entire judgment. Appeal permission covers entire judgment.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Sag om fortsat anbringelse udenfor hjemmet, samt om omfanget af samvær